WebPlaintiff v. DECLARATION AND REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUBPOENA PURSUANT TO ORCP 38 C Defendant Attach the following: foreign subpoena original and two copies of a fully completed subpoena that complies with the requirements of the Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure (ORCP), including ORCP 55 I, (name) WebJan 1, 2024 · In civil cases, the court can only award attorney fees if a statute or contract authorize the award. The process for awarding attorney fees is set out in the Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 68 C (4) (a) requires a party to submit a request for attorney fees no later than 14 days after entry of judgment.
STATE v. STACEY (2024) FindLaw
WebORCP 54 . NOTES OF DECISIONS In nonjury case, motion by defendant for involuntary dismissal is essential to preserve for review issue of sufficiency of plaintiff’s evidence. ... Wacker Siltronic Corp. v. Pakos, 58 Or App 40, 646 P2d 1366 (1982), Sup Ct review denied Voluntary dismissal is available notwithstanding that adverse summary ... WebA (1) The following defenses may, at the option of the pleader, be made by motion to dismiss: A (1) (a) lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter; A (1) (b) lack of jurisdiction over the person; A (1) (c) that there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause; A (1) (d) that plaintiff has not the legal capacity to sue; fisherman leveling guide ffxiv
A cross-sectional study on the relationship between visceral …
WebUnder ORCP 58B, made applicable to criminal trials by ORS 136.330, either the prosecutor or the defendant may make the last argument if "the court for good and sufficient reason" so directs. ... ORCP 58 provides in part: "* * * "B. Order of proceedings on jury trial. When the jury has been selected and sworn, the trial, unless the court for ... WebOct 28, 1998 · Without deciding whether defendant's objection in the trial court was adequate to preserve the constitutional arguments he advances on appeal, we hold that there is no preservation [156 Or.App. 572] problem with respect to his ORCP 58 B argument. ORCP 58 B(5) deals solely and exclusively with closing jury arguments and with the time … WebFeb 19, 2010 · This court noted that the identically worded predecessor to ORCP 58 B(6) — former ORCP 58 B(4) — applied. Because that rule provided that "the plaintiff shall commence and conclude the argument to the jury," the court concluded that "the state, as the plaintiff, ha[d] the right to present a rebuttal argument." Id. at 148. Similarly, in State v. canadian tire hockey water bottle